taxtech500 named azta a winner in two categories for the fourth month running. Read the announcement →

Hospitality, food & agriculture

Use case · Legal

Taking a franchise agreement across the border: a clause-by-clause review

A Polish café chain signs Dutch franchisees on its home template. Upload the agreement and review it against Dutch franchise law and EU competition rules.

Get started free
Legal counsel’s hands with a pen over a bound printed agreement on a café table after hours

This task, run in azta

azta
Attached is our Polish franchise template, translated into English, for franchisees in Utrecht and Eindhoven.
PL · NL · EU
Researching

Reading your files

Searching wetten.overheid.nl

Searching Rechtspraak.nl

Searching Dziennik Ustaw

Searching EUR-Lex · Curia

Poland has no franchise statute. In Poland a franchise agreement is an unnamed contract governed by the Civil Code’s general rules and freedom of contract. The Polish template was drafted for that setting.
The Netherlands regulates franchising in its Civil Code. Since 2021 the Dutch Civil Code contains franchise rules that protect the franchisee and cannot be set aside to its detriment. They include pre-contractual disclosure and a standstill period of at least four weeks before signing.
Non-compete clauses are limited after the term. Dutch law and the EU Vertical Block Exemption Regulation both confine a post-term non-compete: at most one year, limited to the premises or area, and needed to protect the franchisor’s know-how.
Prices can be recommended, not fixed. Under EU competition law a franchisor may recommend prices or set a maximum, but fixing minimum resale prices is a hardcore restriction. Whether a Polish choice of law displaces the Dutch rules is a separate question the review has to settle.
Draft the review memo
franchise-agreement-review.docx
Regenerate
Export
Word (.docx)PDF
Share

Franchise template for the Netherlands: clauses to change

Pre-contractual process. The template is silent on disclosure before signing. Under the Dutch rules we must provide the draft agreement and the specified information to each franchisee in advance and allow the standstill period before signing. The January date for Utrecht should be checked against that period.

Pricing, clause 9. The clause requires franchisees to sell at the prices in the price list. As drafted this fixes resale prices. We recommend replacing it with recommended prices, with a maximum price for promotions.

Non-compete, clause 21. The post-term restriction runs for three years across the whole of the Netherlands. It should be limited to one year and to the franchised premises, and tied to the protection of our know-how.

Sources · wetten.overheid.nl · Rechtspraak.nl · Dziennik Ustaw · EUR-Lex · Curia
Saved

A replay of this page’s example. In azta every line of the answer carries a citation that opens the provision itself.

The situation

A franchise agreement drafted for Poland, uploaded for use in the Netherlands

A bakery-café chain from Poznań has 140 outlets in Poland and has signed letters of intent with franchisees in Utrecht and Eindhoven. The commercial team wants to use the Polish template, translated into English, with the first signing planned for January.

In-house counsel knows the template well and knows Polish law leaves most of it to the parties. The hours go on finding what Dutch law makes mandatory, which clauses fall foul of it and what the EU competition rules allow on prices and non-compete obligations.

What the research has to settle

The rules behind the answer

Poland has no franchise statute
In Poland a franchise agreement is an unnamed contract governed by the Civil Code’s general rules and freedom of contract. The Polish template was drafted for that setting.
The Netherlands regulates franchising in its Civil Code
Since 2021 the Dutch Civil Code contains franchise rules that protect the franchisee and cannot be set aside to its detriment. They include pre-contractual disclosure and a standstill period of at least four weeks before signing.
Non-compete clauses are limited after the term
Dutch law and the EU Vertical Block Exemption Regulation both confine a post-term non-compete: at most one year, limited to the premises or area, and needed to protect the franchisor’s know-how.
Prices can be recommended, not fixed
Under EU competition law a franchisor may recommend prices or set a maximum, but fixing minimum resale prices is a hardcore restriction. Whether a Polish choice of law displaces the Dutch rules is a separate question the review has to settle.

How it runs in azta

From the question to the document

The question, as you would type it

Attached is our Polish franchise template, translated into English, for franchisees in Utrecht and Eindhoven. Which clauses conflict with the Dutch franchise rules or EU competition law, in particular pricing, post-term non-compete and pre-contractual disclosure? Does our Polish choice of law help?
  1. You start with

    A franchise agreement drafted for Poland, uploaded for use in the Netherlands

  2. 01

    Upload the agreement

    Add the template and its annexes. azta reads them and refers each finding back to the clause it concerns.

    File upload· Pro
  3. 02

    Research the mandatory rules

    Ask what Dutch franchise law requires and how EU competition rules treat prices, supply ties and non-compete obligations. azta cites the Dutch Civil Code, the Polish Civil Code and the EU regulation.

    Cited research· Free
  4. 03

    Find the Dutch decisions

    Ask how Dutch courts have applied the franchise rules since they came into force. azta summarises the decisions and links the full text.

    Case-law search
  5. 04

    Draft the review memo

    Ask for a memo by clause: keep, change or remove, with the reason and a suggested redraft. Edit it in Canvas and export to Word.

    Canvas · Ask azta· Pro
  6. You send

    A review memo: clauses that hold, clauses to change and the reasons

What you get

A review memo: clauses that hold, clauses to change and the reasons

Review memo · draft

Franchise template for the Netherlands: clauses to change

Pre-contractual process. The template is silent on disclosure before signing. Under the Dutch rules we must provide the draft agreement and the specified information to each franchisee in advance and allow the standstill period before signing. The January date for Utrecht should be checked against that period.

Pricing, clause 9. The clause requires franchisees to sell at the prices in the price list. As drafted this fixes resale prices. We recommend replacing it with recommended prices, with a maximum price for promotions.

Non-compete, clause 21. The post-term restriction runs for three years across the whole of the Netherlands. It should be limited to one year and to the franchised premises, and tied to the protection of our know-how.

Illustrative excerpt. A real draft is built from your facts and cites the provisions it relies on.

Outcomes on your numbers

What azta is worth on this task

Pro pays for itself after

13 minutes a month

At €130 an hour, that is all the time Pro (€27 a month) has to take off your desk to cover its price.

Example figures. Replace them with your own.

10%50%
Hours back a year
58
Capacity at your rate
€7,488
More franchise agreement reviews a quarter
1.4
Return on Pro
23.1×
Hours a year on this task
Today240 h
Your scenario182 h
  • Research
  • Drafting
  • Your review

A scenario you set, not a promise. The hours that come back go to another client, or deeper into this one.

Want these numbers on your team’s real workload?

Book a demo

Sources azta searches here

  • wetten.overheid.nl
  • Rechtspraak.nl
  • Dziennik Ustaw
  • EUR-Lex · Curia
See the full source register

What stays with you

  • The commercial terms and how far to depart from the Polish template.
  • The pre-contractual disclosure itself, including any turnover forecasts.
  • Advice from Dutch counsel where the business wants it, and the final sign-off.

Frequently asked questions

Can azta compare the Polish and Dutch versions side by side?
Yes. Upload both and ask for a comparison by clause. azta refers back to the passage in each document.
Is the uploaded agreement used for training?
No. Client documents are never used for training on any plan, and they stay in the EU/EEA.
Can the team work on the review together?
On Enterprise, shared workspaces keep the agreement, the research and the memo in one place, with access by membership.

Book a demo

See the review memo built from your own case.

A working session, not a slide deck. Bring a live matter and see azta research it and draft the document, with your team in the room.

  1. 1

    Bring a real question

    One from this week, with the facts you would give a colleague.

  2. 2

    We run it in azta with you

    You watch the research and open the citations against the provision.

  3. 3

    You see the draft it produces

    Then we plan a trial with your team, if it fits your work.

  • Client data is never used for training
  • Data stays in the EU/EEA
  • Shared workspaces, templates and SSO on Enterprise

Rather try it on your own first? Five questions a month are free, no card.

Scheduling runs on Cal.com, which sets its own cookies, so we have not loaded it. Load the scheduler for this visit?

More use cases