taxtech500 named azta a winner in two categories for the fourth month running. Read the announcement →

Groups & cross-border expansion

Use case · Legal

Screening an acquisition target before the advisors start the clock

Check two targets in public sources, read the teasers and filed accounts, and give the board an in-house screening summary before any advisor is engaged.

Get started free
CFO in a cream silk blouse comparing two printed information memoranda on a desk in a packaging plant office

This task, run in azta

azta
Austrian group screening two targets: a Polish sp. z o.o. making corrugated board and a Slovak s.r.o. printing labels.
PL · SK · EU
Researching

Reading your files

Searching Dziennik Ustaw

Searching SAOS

Searching Slov-Lex

Searching EUR-Lex · Curia

Registers show the basics. The Polish and Slovak commercial registers show a company’s form, registered capital, who represents it and, for limited companies, its shareholders. They show what was filed, not whether it is still accurate.
Read the filed accounts against the teaser. Limited companies in both countries file annual financial statements with a public register. Comparing them with the teaser’s figures is the first test of the story.
Insolvency and tax status first. Both countries publish insolvency proceedings, and both make some taxpayer information public, such as Poland’s list of VAT taxpayers. A hit at this stage changes the conversation.
Clearances can set the timetable. Depending on turnover, the deal may need merger control clearance in Poland, Slovakia or at EU level, and foreign-investment screening may apply. The research confirms whether the thresholds are met once the figures are known.
Draft the screening summary
pre-acquisition-screening.docx
Regenerate
Export
Word (.docx)PDF
Share

Two targets: screening summary for the board

Łódź plant. The register matches the teaser. The filed accounts show revenue in line with the teaser but a sharp fall in margin last year that the teaser does not mention. No insolvency or tax flags were found. Open question: the plant’s environmental permits.

Nitra label printer. The register shows a change of managing director three months ago and a pledge over the shares. The latest accounts have not yet been filed. These points need answers before the group goes further.

Recommendation. On the public information, the Łódź plant is the cleaner target. We suggest engaging advisors for it, with the margin fall and the permits as the first questions.

Sources · Dziennik Ustaw · SAOS · Slov-Lex · EUR-Lex · Curia
Saved

A replay of this page’s example. In azta every line of the answer carries a citation that opens the provision itself.

The situation

An acquisition target’s teaser, filed accounts and name

The CFO of a packaging group in Graz has two teasers on her desk: a corrugated-board plant near Łódź and a label printer in Nitra. The board wants to know which to pursue before the group spends money on advisors. She has the information memoranda, three years of filed accounts and one week.

Nobody needs a full due diligence yet. What she needs is a screening: is each company what the teaser says, are there public red flags, and which legal questions will decide the price. The hours go on pulling public information from two countries and writing a summary the board can decide on.

What the research has to settle

The rules behind the answer

Registers show the basics
The Polish and Slovak commercial registers show a company’s form, registered capital, who represents it and, for limited companies, its shareholders. They show what was filed, not whether it is still accurate.
Read the filed accounts against the teaser
Limited companies in both countries file annual financial statements with a public register. Comparing them with the teaser’s figures is the first test of the story.
Insolvency and tax status first
Both countries publish insolvency proceedings, and both make some taxpayer information public, such as Poland’s list of VAT taxpayers. A hit at this stage changes the conversation.
Clearances can set the timetable
Depending on turnover, the deal may need merger control clearance in Poland, Slovakia or at EU level, and foreign-investment screening may apply. The research confirms whether the thresholds are met once the figures are known.

How it runs in azta

From the question to the document

The question, as you would type it

Austrian group screening two targets: a Polish sp. z o.o. making corrugated board and a Slovak s.r.o. printing labels. From the attached teasers and filed accounts, what are the red flags, do the public sources show insolvency or tax issues, and would either deal need merger clearance?
  1. You start with

    An acquisition target’s teaser, filed accounts and name

  2. 01

    Run the company checks

    Check both targets for status, insolvency and tax-debt flags, as far as each country’s public sources allow.

    Due diligence· Pro
  3. 02

    Upload the teasers and accounts

    Add the information memoranda and the filed accounts. azta reads them and refers back to the figure or passage behind each point.

    File upload· Pro
  4. 03

    Research the deal questions

    Ask about merger control, foreign-investment screening and the transfer formalities for each target. azta cites the national and EU rules.

    Cited research· Free
  5. 04

    Write the screening summary

    Ask for a two-page summary per target: what checks out, red flags, open questions and the cost of finding out. Edit it in Canvas.

    Canvas · Ask azta· Pro
  6. You send

    An in-house screening summary for the board

What you get

An in-house screening summary for the board

Screening summary · draft

Two targets: screening summary for the board

Łódź plant. The register matches the teaser. The filed accounts show revenue in line with the teaser but a sharp fall in margin last year that the teaser does not mention. No insolvency or tax flags were found. Open question: the plant’s environmental permits.

Nitra label printer. The register shows a change of managing director three months ago and a pledge over the shares. The latest accounts have not yet been filed. These points need answers before the group goes further.

Recommendation. On the public information, the Łódź plant is the cleaner target. We suggest engaging advisors for it, with the margin fall and the permits as the first questions.

Illustrative excerpt. A real draft is built from your facts and cites the provisions it relies on.

Outcomes on your numbers

What azta is worth on this task

Pro pays for itself after

13 minutes a month

At €130 an hour, that is all the time Pro (€27 a month) has to take off your desk to cover its price.

Example figures. Replace them with your own.

10%50%
Hours back a year
43
Capacity at your rate
€5,616
More target screenings a quarter
1.5
Return on Pro
17.3×
Hours a year on this task
Today168 h
Your scenario125 h
  • Research
  • Drafting
  • Your review

A scenario you set, not a promise. The hours that come back go to another client, or deeper into this one.

Want these numbers on your team’s real workload?

Book a demo

Sources azta searches here

  • Dziennik Ustaw
  • SAOS
  • Slov-Lex
  • EUR-Lex · Curia
See the full source register

What stays with you

  • The commercial judgement on fit and price.
  • Conversations with the seller and its advisors.
  • The recommendation to the board.

Frequently asked questions

Is this a substitute for due diligence?
No. It is a first screening from public sources and the seller’s documents, to decide whether to spend on a full due diligence.
What does the company check cover?
Status, insolvency and tax-debt flags, as far as each country’s public sources allow.
Are the seller’s documents kept confidential?
Uploaded documents are never used for training on any plan and stay in the EU/EEA.

Book a demo

See the screening summary built from your own case.

A working session, not a slide deck. Bring a live matter and see azta research it and draft the document, with your team in the room.

  1. 1

    Bring a real question

    One from this week, with the facts you would give a colleague.

  2. 2

    We run it in azta with you

    You watch the research and open the citations against the provision.

  3. 3

    You see the draft it produces

    Then we plan a trial with your team, if it fits your work.

  • Client data is never used for training
  • Data stays in the EU/EEA
  • Shared workspaces, templates and SSO on Enterprise

Rather try it on your own first? Five questions a month are free, no card.

Scheduling runs on Cal.com, which sets its own cookies, so we have not loaded it. Load the scheduler for this visit?

More use cases